Wednesday, June 07, 2023
Premium Crypto Info
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
    • Bitcoin
    • Etherum
    • Altcoin
  • NFTs
  • Coin Marketcap
  • Airdrops
  • Top 10 Coins
  • Tweets
    Home / Blog Archive / News / Altcoin / Ripple vs SEC: Examining the SEC’s Strategy to Prove XRP is Security
BTC/USD
  • BTC/USD
  • XRP/USD
  • BCH/USD
  • EOS/USD
  • LTC/USD
  • TRX/USD
  • ADA/USD
  • XLM/USD
  • IOT/USD
  • ABC/USD
  • NEO/USD
  • XMR/USD
  • DASH/USD
  • XEM/USD
  • QTUM/USD
  • BCN/USD
  • ICX/USD
  • ZEC/USD
  • LSK/USD
  • IOST/USD
Low
High
Marketcap
Altcoin Bitcoin Blockchain Etherum Litecoin NFTs
May 15, 2023 by Felix
Share this:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Plus
  • Pinterest
  • Email to a Friend

Ripple vs SEC: Examining the SEC’s Strategy to Prove XRP is Security


The Ripple vs SEC lawsuit is heating up as we draw closer to the final ruling. The crypto industry is eagerly anticipating the outcome as it’s expected to set a precedent in the US. The main point of contention is whether XRP is a security, as claimed by the SEC, or a token, as claimed by Ripple. 

With the legal battle having started in 2020, numerous predictions and opinions have been offered. Recently, Bill Morgan has provided insight into the SEC’s strategy for proving XRP’s security status. Stay tuned for more updates on this exciting legal saga.

Examining the SEC’s Approach and Ripple’s Defense in the XRP Security Debate

Ripple’s General Counsel Stuart Alderoty criticized the SEC for substituting concepts and equating common interests with a common enterprise. This prompted lawyer and crypto enthusiast Bill Morgan to speculate on how the SEC plans to label XRP as security and potentially harm the crypto industry. 

Morgan suggests the SEC is stretching the Howey test by expanding the definition of “common enterprise” to avoid linking it to specific transactions, focusing on the adjective “common” instead. He believes the SEC aims to argue that a common interest alone is sufficient.

Morgan further explains that the SEC, in its summary judgment motion, highlights instances where Ripple promoted the alignment of its interests with XRP holders. If this evidence is deemed insufficient, the SEC resorts to the fungible argument, according to a legal expert. The argument rests on the idea that all XRP units are interchangeable and experience similar fluctuations, which the SEC claims establishes a common enterprise, even though it is merely a common interest.

Morgan notes that Ripple’s legal team challenged the fungible argument by citing gold as an example in their summary judgment motion. He warns that if the SEC is allowed to reduce common enterprise to the common interest, it could apply the fungible argument to other cryptocurrencies as well, setting a dangerous precedent. Morgan believes this could result in significant harm to the crypto industry.

The Ripple vs SEC lawsuit’s outcome holds significant implications for the crypto industry, as the SEC stretches the Howey test to prove XRP’s security status. The verdict could set a precedent impacting the regulatory landscape and shaping the future of cryptocurrencies in the US. The industry anxiously awaits the final ruling.





Source link

ExaminingProveRippleSECSECsSecurityStrategyXRP
Previous Post
Bitcoin Price Analysis: BTC Prices Remain Stagnant for 6 Months Amidst Investor Uncertainty
Next Post
Stablecoins Social Volumes Rises As Bitcoin Teases $25.7k; Here is What to Expect Next

Related Posts

Altcoin Bitcoin Blockchain Etherum Litecoin NFTs
SEC Celebrates Its 89th Anniversary
June 7, 2023 by Felix
Altcoin Bitcoin Blockchain Etherum Litecoin NFTs
Jim Cramer Labels SEC Lawsuit a Major Setback for Binance
June 7, 2023 by Felix
Altcoin Bitcoin Blockchain Etherum Litecoin NFTs
Coinbase Battles SEC Lawsuit – Legal Showdown Begins!
June 7, 2023 by Felix
Premium Crypto Info
About

All-in-one crypto information in one place

Categories
Copyright © 2018 Cryptex. All Rights Reserved.